Q&A
Q: Why do you write?
A:
Q: Which of your pieces do you consider to be the most successful?
A:
Q: Have you considered employing contemporary literary techniques, such as structuring a story in the format of an interview with the questions omitted?
A:
Q: I feel the same way. Also, why should answers be considered more important or meaningful than the questions?
A:
Q: Like 42?
A:
Q: Wouldn’t Socrates be more relevant here?
A:
Q: But, going back to the subject of questions, how do you see them fitting into a narrative?
A:
Q: So, might a better formulation of that old saw “show, don’t tell” be “question, don’t answer?”
A:
Q: What if the reader doesn’t interpolate good answers to the questions?
A:
Q: Isn’t that the author’s job, though? I mean, could the piece even be compelling if they didn’t?
A:
Q: Are you thinking of Twin Peaks?
A:
Q: Would you agree that it is easier to deepen a mystery than to resolve it?
A:
Q: But might that be taking the conceit too far?
A:
Q:
A:
Q: Yes, I see things can get away from you… Maybe it’s okay to do that?
A:
Q: Ha! I love it. Can I steal that bit about “like a connect the dots without enough dots”?
A:
Q: Thank you very much for your time. It’s been a pleasure. I’m sure our readers will find some valuable ideas for their own writing.
A:
Q: Do you always have to have the last word?
A: